Don't Miss...
Methods of Economic Evaluation: What are the Ethical Implications for Healthy Public Policy?
 1,5 MB

An Introduction to the Ethical Implications of Economic Evaluations for Healthy Public Policy
 645 K


Links
Advancing Population and Public Health Economics: Workshop Proceedings.
A collaboration between CIHR-IPPH, PHAC, NCCPH and CPHI-CIHI. On the site of the National Collaborating Centres for Public Health (NCCPH). 288 K.

Investing in prevention : The economic perspective. On the site of the Public Health Agency of Canada.

Advancing Population and Public Health Economics: Annotated Bibliography. On the site of the Canadian Institutes for Health Research - Institute of Population and Public Health (CIHR-IPPH).

Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis (CHEPA). On the site of CHEPA, based at McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario. 

Choosing Interventions that are Cost Effective (WHO-CHOICE). Guides to cost-effectiveness analysis on the site of the World Health Organization.

Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE). Links to global resources on the site of CHERE at the University of Technology Sydney (Aus.)

College des Économistes de la Santé (CES). Links to dozens of global resources in health economics, on the site of CES (Paris).


Contact

Olivier Bellefleur


Economic Evaluation

Economic evaluation is a process that compares the respective benefits and costs of different interventions, programs and policies.

The objective of this technique is to measure the efficiency, or the utility of the money spent on an intervention as compared to another.

Image of four buckets, one with money© iStockphoto.com/ Yegor Korzh        Economic evaluations aim to produce evidence to clarify decisions around the value of investing in programs, where value can be understood at different levels (economic, social, political, etc.)

Economic evaluation is therefore seen as one of the available tools that can help decision-makers to make judicious choices among a vast range of options and to make wise use of public resources. It is in demand by decision-makers, and it is therefore no surprise that many knowledge syntheses contain economic analysis as part of their analyses.

This is particularly the case in the work of the Guide to Community Preventive Services  produced in the United States (Briss, 2000). However, the use of these methods is not immune to questions.

How can the instruments and methods arising from economic analysis me made useful for public health actors working to promote healthy public policies?

For this project, the Centre has collaborated with Professor Laurie Goldsmith of Simon Fraser University. A series of documents can be found on our site.

 
References 
Innvaer, S., et al. (2002) Health policy-makers' perceptions of their use of evidence: a systematic review. J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002

Petticrew, M., et al. (2004). Evidence for public health policy on inequalities: 1: The reality according to policymakers. J Epidemiol Community Health 2004;58:811–816. doi: 10.1136

Briss, P., et al. (2000) Developing an Evidence-Based Guide to Community Preventive Services—Methods. Am J Prev Med 2000;18(1S), Pages 35-43 



Photo Credits:
© iStockphoto.com/ Yegor Korzh
For information about how to legally obtain these images,
click here.


We would like to hear from you
Please send us a note to share your comments on our work, or to let us know about potential projects, ideas, interests, or new resources relating to healthy public policy.

Name* :  
Email :  
Comment* :  
Spam protection question
The production of the NCCHPP website has been made possible through a financial contribution from the Public Health Agency of Canada.